A group of scientists used rats
as specimens for an
experiment designed to test the transformation of
cells. Transformation
is a cell process in which normal cells become cancerous. (Experiment modified from lecture
material, WSU, College of Science, Dr. John Taylor, Cancer Cell
Biology)
The scientists used two kinds of chemicals
in their experiments
to test rat cell transformation. The chemicals belonged to two
groups--an
initiation group (I) and
a promotion group
(P).
The chemicals were pasted to the back (or dorsal) surface of the
rats' chest cavities on day one with no further applications of
the chemical. After the time period of five years, cells from the
patch where chemicals were pasted, were viewed and analyzed under
the microscope. Cells that did NOT transform were
labeled (NC) for
normal cells. Cells that did transform were labeled (CC) for cancerous cells. Groups of 100 rats were tested in each of the
following experiments. Many series of experiments were begun on
the same day and data collection on transformation began at the
end of five years. (Some exceptions are noted in the following
details of each trial.)
Series One
One rat group had only the (I) pasted to their backs on day one. Another group, had
only the (P) pasted to their backs on day one. After five years, the
cells from each group of rats were analyzed for transformation. None of these cells from either group
were transformed, so all were labeled (NC) for normal cells.
What
might these data from series one tell us about
these chemicals and transformation?
Series Two
In the next series of experiments, one rat group had the (I) pasted to their backs on day one and again on day 30.
Likewise, another rat group had the (P) pasted to
their backs on day one and again on day 30. After five years, the
cells from each rat group were analyzed for transformation. None of these cells from either group
were transformed, so all were labeled (NC).
What
might these data from series two tell us about
these chemicals and transformation?
Series Three
In one group of rats, the (I)
chemical was pasted on day one and the (P) chemical was pasted on day 30. After
five years, these cells were analyzed for transformation. ALL cells had transformed and were labeled (CC)
for cancerous cells. The
next rat group was tested by pasting the (P) chemical to their backs on day one and the (I) chemical to their backs on day 30. After five years,
these cells were analyzed for transformation
and all were normal
(NC).
What
might these data from series three tell us about these
chemicals and transformation?
Series Four
In this next series of tests, scientists exposed one rat group to
the (P) chemical on day one, the (I) chemical on
day 30, and the (P) chemical
on day 60. After five years, these cells were analyzed for transformation. ALL
cells were cancerous and labeled (CC). In the final rat group to be tested, the (I) chemical was pasted on day one and the (P) chemical was pasted two years later.
After five years, the cells were analyzed. ALL cells were cancerous and
labeled (CC).
What might these data from series four tell us about
these chemicals and transformation?
How could you
summarize these
experimental data and apply it to human cell transformation?
Series One Data might be
interpreted in the following way...
One
application of either the (I) or the (P) chemical will NOT
lead to cancer in rats.
Series Two Data might be
interpreted in the following way...
Two
applications of (I) will not lead to
cancer in rat cells. Two applications of (P) will not lead to
cancer in rat cells.
Series Three Data might be
interpreted in the following way...
The
order in which (I) and (P)
are
applied to the rats determines the presence or absence of cancer.
If (I) chemical is
applied before (P), then cells in
rats become cancerous. If (P) is applied before (I), then rat cells
remain normal.
Series Four Data might be
interpreted in the following way...
Cancer
occurs only if (P) follows (I) exposure. And the
amount of time that exists between chemical exposures is not
relevant. What matters is, if (P) exposure follows (I) exposure even up
to two years, cancer will develop in rat cells.
Summarize these
experimental data
Exposure to chemicals contributes to transforming normal cells into cancer
cells. However, the kind of chemical
exposure, whether an initiator (I) or a promoter
(P), and the sequence of the types of chemicals that a rat
is exposed to determines the presence or absence of cancer cells.
If the sequence of exposure is (I) before (P), it does not matter if the rat is exposed to (P) immediately after (I) is introduced or years later.What matters is, if (P) comes after (I)
exposure, rats get cancer.
Since rats are vertbrate mammals, it follows that we might apply
this information to human transformation.
Is is possible that human cells need at least two exposures to
two different kind of chemicals and in a specific sequence prior
to some kinds of cancer formation???
What are these (I) and (P) chemicals?
Does the manner in which one is exposed (inhaled, ingested, skin
contact) to these chemicals impact transformation?